Ask Questions. Share Answers. Pitch Better.
Welcome to LetsTalkPitching.com, the largest online baseball pitching community. More than 9,600 coaches, parents and players are here to help you improve! You'll find over 104,775 active baseball discussions on just about every professional, amateur and youth pitching topic imaginable.
You are currently viewing our baseball forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to the discussions.
By joining our free community, you will be able to post topics, participate in the chat room, view video, get your pitching mechanics analyzed, respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so join our baseball community today – and let's talk pitching!
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
FSTBLLTHRWER All Star


Joined: 09 Apr 2007 Posts: 691
|
Posted: Apr 15, 2007 Post subject: Big Curve vs. Hard Curve? |
|
|
Which of these two pitches, the bigger "Uncle Charlie" type curveball, or the harder "Yellow Hammer" type curveball is generally more effective? Easier on the arm to throw? Easier to learn/throw for strikes? And which one would be better for specific repetoires (ex. which is better for a finesse guy or a power pitcher)?
I understand that both pitches can be extremely effective when thrown by people who have mastered them, Barry Zito for example has made a career throwing his shoulders to knees 12-6. But on the other hand Felix Hernandez made my Redsox look stupid last week throwing an 85mph hammer.
I'm asking because I'm trying to build a curve that I can use throughout my highschool career, and I'm aiming for the "yellow hammer" type. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
centerfield2150 Superstar

Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 1218
|
Posted: Apr 15, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
In my experience unless you're throwing straight heat, the hammer style is actually more effective. Because the hitter is trying for his life to get around on your fastball, he's able to read the uncle charlie curveball and still get a blooper out of it.
They will often not even pick up the hard curveball until it's to late.
I've also found a hanging hard curveball is damaged much less than a slow one for me.
I think the hard curveball is just more effective in HS.
Last year I threw some great curves, fooled the hitter but too often he was able to drag his bat and get a blooper over my not so quick infielders.
If the hard curveball is not picked up right away the most they seem to get is a grounder to the shortstop.
Don't get me wrong, if you hang it, it will fly a long ways no matter what speed, it just seems the hard curve is less susceptible to giving up weak hits. _________________ Why not?
"Practice as if you’ve never won, perform as if you’ve never lost, and make sure you leave it all out there on the field, because it will be over sooner than you think."
-Adam Revelette |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Administrator

Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 5363 Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Posted: Apr 15, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with Centerfield. I like the hard-thrown curve. It has better deception because it starts off looking more like a fastball because it's thrown with the same arm speed and because its trajectory is closer to that of the fastball.
The hard-thrown curve also breaks later and I think that makes it more difficult to hit.
Last edited by Roger on Apr 16, 2007; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YoungMarianO College

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 131 Location: Brooklyn, New York
|
Posted: Apr 16, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
yep hard curve is my favorite you throw it with a fastball motion and it sinks towards the end always my effective pitch _________________ Arsenal: 4 Seam, Knuckle Curve, Sinker, Changeup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris O'Leary Legend

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 2213 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: Apr 16, 2007 Post subject: Re: Big Curve vs. Hard Curve? |
|
|
| FSTBLLTHRWER wrote: |
| Which of these two pitches, the bigger "Uncle Charlie" type curveball, or the harder "Yellow Hammer" type curveball is generally more effective? |
I like a big Uncle Charlie because it can be harder to hit and I think it is easier on the arm due to the lower velocity and stress.
Also, ask Brad Lidge about the danger of throwing a flat slider/hard curve.
I think a hung Uncle Charlie is still harder to hit than a flat slider (which ends up being just a slow fastball).
Of course, I watched the game where King Felix went up against Dice-K and Felix's hard curve was nasty. However, not everyone can throw that pitch that well (or possibly for long due to the stress on the elbow). _________________ http://www.chrisoleary.com/projects/Baseball/index.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FSTBLLTHRWER All Star


Joined: 09 Apr 2007 Posts: 691
|
Posted: Apr 16, 2007 Post subject: Re: Big Curve vs. Hard Curve? |
|
|
| Chris O'Leary wrote: |
| FSTBLLTHRWER wrote: |
| Which of these two pitches, the bigger "Uncle Charlie" type curveball, or the harder "Yellow Hammer" type curveball is generally more effective? |
I like a big Uncle Charlie because it can be harder to hit and I think it is easier on the arm due to the lower velocity and stress.
Also, ask Brad Lidge about the danger of throwing a flat slider/hard curve.
I think a hung Uncle Charlie is still harder to hit than a flat slider (which ends up being just a slow fastball).
Of course, I watched the game where King Felix went up against Dice-K and Felix's hard curve was nasty. However, not everyone can throw that pitch that well (or possibly for long due to the stress on the elbow).
|
True about Lidge but most of us don't have to face Albert Pujols on a regular basis. I'll take his slider any day lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tanner Lorenz All Star

Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 706
|
Posted: Apr 16, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| I have both, a power curve and a 12-6 curve, my 12-6 is way more effective. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
andrew.ra. All Star

Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 533 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Apr 16, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
I've got a really sharp breaking hard-curve /slider. It's nasty. The only problem is, NO ONE swings at it. They take it for a ball in the dirt every single time.
What's been working for me is a slow, big breaker that I start at the hitters shoulder. _________________ "Why turn something as simple as throwing into a science project?"-- Leo Mazzone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ian demagi Major League

Joined: 08 May 2006 Posts: 327 Location: cincinnati
|
Posted: Apr 26, 2007 Post subject: big Curve vs hard Curve |
|
|
| Depens on what type of pitcher you are. If you are bringing high heat then you want the contrast of a large slower curve. If you are a breaking ball pitcher you probably want both!, Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
terprhp Major League

Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 363
|
Posted: Apr 26, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| Either pitch has it's purpose, it's all about how and where it's used in the sequencing of pitches. And for my money, there is no pitch more hittable than a flat slider...you speed up the bat AND keep the ball on 1 plane , dangerous combination. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
4pie All Star

Joined: 20 Nov 2006 Posts: 555 Location: Montréal, MTL
|
Posted: Apr 26, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| the big-- curveball is extremely effective for any kind of pitchers if not thrown too often. maybe 10 times a game to get ahead on the hitter or to surprise him once in a while. tom glavine has a pretty decent slowish curveball and usually hitters don't even take the bat off the shoulder since it's surprising. they probably know it's not going to be a fastball but it's so rare from him that they probably just go WTF? a sharp breaking ball is usually thrown by a pitcher with a good fastball even though most people said otherwise. the reason for it is that it has to be thrown pretty hard to be considered a hard curveball. anything else is a curveball in the dirt that breaks too early. hitters want to catch up for the heat too so they might swing away sometimes and they end up swinging over the top. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WhiteSox101 Minor League


Joined: 30 Sep 2006 Posts: 257 Location: West Virginia
|
Posted: Apr 27, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't throw heat, but I throw high 70"s low 80's and I think the bigger breaking slower curveball is more effective the better you can mask it. Just my opinion, I think you can do equally good with both though even though the harder curve is definatly harder on your arm. _________________ KNUCKEBALL!!!
http://www.myspace.com/121389j |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|